Tribunal having decided not to proceed with the matter on the ...

Tribunal Can't Decide Appeals on Merits After Dismissing Case for Delay Without Fair Hearing for Appellant.

February 12, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Tribunal having decided not to proceed with the matter on the ground of condonation of delay, cannot unilaterally decide the appeals on merits, more so when the appellant/assessee was not given proper opportunity to contest the matter in the main appeals on merits - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal having decided not to proceed with the matter on the ...

Tribunal Can't Decide Appeals on Merits After Dismissing Case for Delay Without Fair Hearing for Appellant.

February 12, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Condonation of delay - Delay in filing of refilling of appeal - the delay of 707 days has occurred in refiling and not in filing of the appeals. - the High Court ought...

Power of Tribunal to dismiss the Appeals for want of prosecution - Even if the assessee could not appear, the Tribunal should decided the appeal on merits, ex parte,...

Delay of 1190 days in filing appeal against order u/s 143(1) was condoned. Appellant filed rectification petition u/s 154 against order u/s 143(1) which was pending...

CESTAT allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appeal filed on 30.02.2019 was within one month of receipt of the order in original by the appellant. The Commissioner...

HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

The case involves the rejection of appeals without deciding on merits due to self-assessment discrepancies u/s 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's claim...

Power of tribunal to decide an appeal on merit without addressing the issue of pre-deposit - tribunal has committed an error - remanded back to Tribunal to be heard afresh - HC

Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - No doubt there was no application seeking Condonation of delay was filed by the appellant as has been acknowledged by ld....

The HC held that the Commissioner's order under Section 263 of the IT Act constituted an open remand, not a closed remand, as it set aside the assessment order and...

The appellate authority erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte in the absence of the appellant or their counsel. The statutory mandate requires the appellate authority to...

Condonation of delay in filling appeal before CIT(A) - CIT(A) dismissing the appeal of the assessee in-limine - The Appellate Tribunal recognized the appellant's...

Quick Updates: