Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and ...


Tribunal can't decide appeal ex parte sans appellant, violates natural justice. Dismiss for non-prosecution if appellant absent, not decide merits.

July 30, 2024

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of natural justice. Where the appellant does not appear, the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution rather than deciding it on merits. The proviso to Rule 63(4) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules, 2008, allowing ex parte hearing in absence of either party, should be interpreted as permitting ex parte proceedings against the respondent/State in case of their non-appearance, but not against the appellant/plaintiff. In case of appellant's absence, the only consequence should be dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution, not deciding it on merits. Adequate provision for rectification u/s 31 exists if an ex parte order is passed against the appellant. The impugned order deciding the appeal ex parte in appellant's absence is illegal, arbitrary, and set aside, with the matter remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration after hearing the parties.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Violation of principles of natural justice - ex-parte order - failure to appeal on the first date - The learned Tribunal was clearly unjustified in deciding the second...

  2. Violation of principles of natural justice - ex-parte order - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in...

  3. Validity of orders that were ex parte in nature - The order are ex facie, bad in law, because (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of...

  4. Violation of principles of natural justice - order in original has been passed ex-parte to the petitioner - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments,...

  5. Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural...

  6. Impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, violation of principles of natural justice. Tribunal failed to consider grounds raised by petitioner for delay in...

  7. Validity of summary order passed u/s 140 and 43(9) - Matching of credit - Violation of principles of natural justice - order passed ex-parte in nature - Violation of...

  8. Tribunal dismissed the appeal despite the adjournment sought by the appellant - The order passed by the Tribunal being contrary to the principles of natural justice - HC

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  10. The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

  11. Principles of natural justice - it was the assessee, who invited the attention of the Tribunal to the balance sheet - the Tribunal is entitled to come to its own...

  12. Ex-parte order passed by CIT- A - Denial of natural justice - the principle of audi alteram partem is the basic concept of natural justice. The expression "audi alteram...

  13. Ex-parte order - The order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, entails civil consequences; (c) It is also found that the...

  14. Violation of principles of natural justice - ex-parte order - the first appellate authority was not justified in rejecting the application for recalling the ex-parte...

  15. Validity of Ex-parte order passed u/s 74 - No sufficient time was afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed ex parte in nature, does not assign...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates