Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and ...


Tribunal Cannot Decide Appeal Ex Parte Without Appellant; Must Dismiss for Non-appearance, Ensuring Fairness.

July 30, 2024

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of natural justice. Where the appellant does not appear, the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution rather than deciding it on merits. The proviso to Rule 63(4) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules, 2008, allowing ex parte hearing in absence of either party, should be interpreted as permitting ex parte proceedings against the respondent/State in case of their non-appearance, but not against the appellant/plaintiff. In case of appellant's absence, the only consequence should be dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution, not deciding it on merits. Adequate provision for rectification u/s 31 exists if an ex parte order is passed against the appellant. The impugned order deciding the appeal ex parte in appellant's absence is illegal, arbitrary, and set aside, with the matter remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration after hearing the parties.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Appeal decided ex parte - non-appearance on behalf of the assessee - though the assessee has not explained any plausible reason for non-appearance before the Tribunal,...

  2. Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the Revenue on merits and ex-parte - The proviso to Rule 25 deals with the situation where the Tribunal has passed...

  3. Rejection of application u/s 254(2) by the ITAT to re-call the order - order was passed ex-parte - non appearance of assessee - No litigant would stand benefited by not...

  4. CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

  5. ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

  6. Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the...

  7. There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT

  8. The Appellate Tribunal considered an ex-parte assessment u/s 144 and an application for additional evidence. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed...

  9. ITAT reversed AO's additions under s.68 for unexplained bank deposits, finding that while deposits were added as unexplained income, corresponding withdrawals from the...

  10. Rectification u/s 254 - Sale of land - land in question were sold by the assessee in the capacity of power of attorney holder and AO has assessed the income in the hand...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - reasons to believe - The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening, considering the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer...

  12. ITAT dismissed an appeal solely on account of non-appearance of the appellant - the first application aforesaid of the petitioner, filed in or about March, 2017, for...

  13. Impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, violation of principles of natural justice. Tribunal failed to consider grounds raised by petitioner for delay in...

  14. Ex- parte order - ITAT dismissed the appeal for non appearance - the expression “dispose of the appeal on merits” occurring Rule 24 would acquire significance. In other...

  15. Ex-parte order - Non compliance of notice issued by the Authorities and non appearance before the Authorities inspite of repeated notices/summons is dis-regard towards...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates