Non-application of mind (on the part of the adjudicating ...

Adjudicating Authority's Failure to Consider Undermines Trust, Costs Imposed for Irresponsible Quasi-Judicial Conduct.

April 7, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Non-application of mind (on the part of the adjudicating authority) is indeed writ bold and large across the impugned order. Such orders adversely and severely impinge upon the public's trust in the public authorities and for that reason a public authority displaying such egregiously irresponsible conduct and that too while performing quasi-judicial functions deserves to the put to costs. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-application of mind (on the part of the adjudicating ...

Adjudicating Authority's Failure to Consider Undermines Trust, Costs Imposed for Irresponsible Quasi-Judicial Conduct.

April 7, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Imposition of Cost on adjudicating authority - The adjudicating authority had passed the order without application of mind and such orders adversely and severely impinge...

Initiation of CIRP - Period of Limitation - Exclusion of certain period - NCLT rejected the application - The Adjudicating Authority has committed error in rejecting the...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

The court found that the factual position was not in dispute. The authority made assessments for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 based on an intelligence report....

Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

Levy of tax with penalty - validity period of the E-Way bill stood expired - where a statute provides extension of time to a transporter, the Adjudicating Authority...

Undervalued/preferential/fraudulent transactions - Failure to adjudicate about the ingredients of Section 43, 45, 49 and 66, specifically - need for separate...

Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal -...

Differential income on stock broking – – recidivist and futile endeavours by Revenue for utopian perfection tends to undermine the stability of law and impose wholly...

CIRP - Jurisdiction of Adjudicating Authority - imposition of cost / fine and intent of Section 70 of IBC - There are no hesitation in holding that the word “fine”, used...

Provisional release of the exportable goods - insistence on bank guarantee or revenue deposit equal to the amount declared free on board of the goods plus the probable...

Valuation of excisable goods - Amendment to Section 4 - change from Normal value to Transaction value - The Adjudicating Authorities as well as CESTAT are also guilty of...

The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust...

This case deals with the tax liability u/s 115BBC(1) for anonymous donations received in the "Hundi" by a charitable and religious trust. The key points are: The...

Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

Quick Updates: