Demand u/s 11A - Extended period of limitation - there was a ...

Section 11A Demand: No Malafide Intent Found as Manufacturers Followed Common Practice in Claiming Exemption Benefits.

May 9, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Demand u/s 11A - Extended period of limitation - there was a general practice in the trade to claim the benefit of exemption - Appellants can not be said to have any malafide intention if the same benefit was availed by them which was also being availed by similarly placed manufacturer- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand u/s 11A - Extended period of limitation - there was a ...

Section 11A Demand: No Malafide Intent Found as Manufacturers Followed Common Practice in Claiming Exemption Benefits.

May 9, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units supplied by one party to another, leading to a demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The...

GST, a success of vast proportions, decreased tax incidence on common man, reduced compliance burden and logistics cost for trade and industry. Amendments facilitated...

Demand of of interest and penalty - If by efflux of time and in absence of availability of extended period of limitation, such show cause notice itself had become...

Recovery of interest u/s 87 without issuance of SCN - in cases where duty has been paid belatedly and interest has not been paid, interest needs to be demanded and...

Section 9 is being amended to exclude Extra Neutral Alcohol used in alcoholic liquor manufacture from central tax. Section 10(5) is amended to refer to new section 74A....

Validity of Show Cause notice (SCN) issued - erroneous refund granted - If the exercise of jurisdiction u/s 11A of the Act was to be hooked or hinged upon the provisions...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Scope of IBC - dishonor of cheque - compounding of offences - Recovery of the dues - Section 65(1) of the Code does not expressly mention ‘Debt Recovery Action’ under...

The High Court interpreted the phrase "where it is possible to do so" u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ruling that it allows flexibility only in exceptional...

The adjudicating authority proposed to change the classification and denying exemption, there should be a clear demand issued u/s 11A. Whereas, in the present case,...

The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding service tax recovery for 2011-2012. The demand for April-September 2011 was time-barred, exceeding even the extended...

100% EOU - validity of demand u/s 28A - Heading of Section 28A gives ‘power’ not to recover duties not levied or short levied as a result general practice, Section 28...

Recovery and demand of duty from the purchaser of goods in auction - auction by the official liquidator of the manufacturing company - assessee is neither a manufacturer...

The court held that the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be invoked against the appellant as there was no...

Quick Updates: