Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2015 Year 2015 This

Dishonour of cheque - No Separate notices issued to the ...


Supreme Court Clarifies: No Need for Separate Notices to Directors u/s 138 for Cheque Dishonor Cases.

June 11, 2015

Case Laws     Indian Laws     SC

Dishonour of cheque - No Separate notices issued to the directors in addition to the company - There is nothing in Section 138 which may even remotely suggest issuance of notice to anyone other than the drawer. - SC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dishonor of Cheque - Different cheques, may be issued for discharging the liability, arising out of one and same transaction, are separate entities and dishonour of each...

  2. Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - requirement to issue separate notice to manager or not - Admittedly, in this case, the liability of the petitioner company...

  3. HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

  4. Dishonor of cheque - presumption that cheque was issued in discharge of legal liability, burden on accused to prove contrary. Supreme Court observations: While deciding...

  5. Dishonor of Cheque - validity of legal notice - the exact amount, which the appellant claimed for towards the dishonoured cheques was not mentioned in the legal notice,...

  6. Dishonor of cheque due to account freeze falls within the purview of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The test is whether the account had insufficient...

  7. Dishonor of Cheque - Generally, in the criminal law, mens rea is an essential component of crime but dishonour of cheque is a criminal offence where there is no need to...

  8. The High Court addressed the challenge to the acquittal of the accused u/s 255(1) of Cr. P. C. for dishonoring a cheque due to insufficient funds. It clarified that the...

  9. Dishonor of Cheque - funds insufficient - difference in drawer’s signature - Apex Court has held that, criminal prosecution against the accused in such cases should be...

  10. The High Court examined the validity of the summoning order and framing of notice u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in a dishonor of cheque case. It...

  11. Dishonor of cheque u/s 138 - validity of statutory demand notice - The legal notice is not confined to the cheque amount. The respondents have not specifically asked for...

  12. This case pertains to the dishonor of cheques and the challenge to cognizance and summoning orders. The key points are: The cheques were signed and issued by respondent...

  13. Dishonor of Cheque - For proving offence under Section 138 of NI Act, it has to be established that the cheque has been issued by the accused to discharge a legally...

  14. Dishonor of Cheque - Plaint was filed that Cheque was issued as security and misused by the defendant - Jurisdiction of Revisional Court in rejecting the plaint - In the...

  15. Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques)....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates