Effective Date of beneficiary provisions - whether should be ...

Court Upholds April 1, 1996, as Effective Date for Central Excise, Denies Retroactive Application Without Correlation.

July 9, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Effective Date of beneficiary provisions - whether should be retrospective - once the co-relation could not be established, then the Petitioners derive no benefit of the Constitutional provisions and selection of the date, namely, 1st April 1996 for they being brought into effect. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Effective Date of beneficiary provisions - whether should be ...

Court Upholds April 1, 1996, as Effective Date for Central Excise, Denies Retroactive Application Without Correlation.

July 9, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the notices issued u/s 148 for reassessment on or after April 1, 2021, are barred by limitation u/ss 148 and 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

Method of Valuation - section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 or section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - packages of cake mixes manufactured having been affixed with...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

GST Revenue collection in the month of April 2018 exceeds ₹ 1 Lakh Crore

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Due date of filing of Tran-1 return - extension till 10th May, 2018 - given that only 25th, 26th and 27th April, 2018 are the working days available before 30th April,...

SC held that Respondent No. 1 breached multiple contractual obligations in the allotment agreement, including failure to secure statutory approvals and execute sub-lease...

Acquittal of the respondents for the charge under Sections 9(1)(b), 9(1)(bb), 1(1)(c) and 9AA punishable under Section 9(1)(i) of the Central Excise Act - Even if a...

Rate of duty of excise increased from 10% to 12% and 1% to 2%

Grant of Interim award - stridhana property of Respondent No. 1 or not - Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Arbitrator has committed a...

Service Tax on Works contract – Supreme Court uphold the validity of Circular 98/1/2008-ST, denying option to pay ST under composition scheme for old contracts.

Disallowance of prior period expenses pertaining to expenditure crystallized or details received after completion of earlier years' audits. Genuineness not doubted,...

CENVAT Credit - input services - The appellant has specifically come out with a case that the CENVAT Credit availed by the appellant for the period 2011-12 pertains to...

CENVAT Credit availed by the Appellant for providing the output service of ‘renting of immovable property’ - there is no manner of doubt that CENVAT Credit availed by...

The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral proceedings u/s 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court found no evidence of...

Quick Updates: