The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

May 18, 2024

The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral proceedings u/s 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court found no evidence of Sheil's abandonment of the claim. Regular participation in Marico's proceedings and absence of simultaneous scheduling were noted. - The Tribunal's duty to schedule hearings and manage proceedings was highlighted, and the mere absence of a party from a hearing does not imply abandonment or justify termination of proceedings. - The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, reinstating the arbitration proceedings and emphasizing the need for an active role by the Arbitral Tribunal in managing the process.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The legality and validity of the termination of arbitral ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

May 18, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of arbitration proceedings/constitution of the arbitral tribunal - ex-parte proceedings - seeking permission to adduce evidence - an application for setting...

Reference of disputes arising out of collaboration agreement to arbitration - appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal - the proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - absence of evidence of service of notice u/s 143(2) - As regards participation in the reassessment proceedings by the assessee,...

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

Validity of Arbitration Award - amicable settlement between the parties - A harmonious reading of Section 31, 34(1), 34(2A) and 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

Carry forward and set off of business losses u/s 32(2) is subject to the provisions of Sections 72(2) and 72(3). Depreciation allowance carried forward u/s 32(2), though...

The High Court addressed the restriction on the petitioner's claim for GST amounts due to the end of the agreement between the respondent and the renter. The court held...

Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court...

Depreciation on leased assets - section 32 - Section 2(13) and Section 2(24) the income derived from leasing of the trucks would be business income - depreciaion allowed - HC

Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Set off of Depreciation allowances - even after eight subsequent assessment years - any unabsorbed depreciation available to an Assessee on 01.04.2002 will be dealt with...

Validity of Parallel proceedings under GST - the device of transferring investigations or proceedings inter se proper officers to ensure that a taxpayer is not subjected...

Characterization of receipt - Compensation receipt on termination of contract - Addition under Section 28(ii)(e) - The Tribunal differentiates between termination and...

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

Quick Updates: