Since AO has not conclusively proved the fact that there is an ...

AO Fails to Prove Arrangement with AE; Section 80IA(10) Deduction Disallowance Deemed Unjustified.

July 27, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Since AO has not conclusively proved the fact that there is an arrangement between assessee and its AE by which the transactions were so arranged as to produce more than the ordinary profits in the hands of assessee, disallowance of part deduction claimed by applying the provisions of section 80IA(10), in our view is not justified - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since AO has not conclusively proved the fact that there is an ...

AO Fails to Prove Arrangement with AE; Section 80IA(10) Deduction Disallowance Deemed Unjustified.

July 27, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT ruled against disallowance of transportation expenses, finding the Assessing Officer failed to establish statutory grounds u/s 37 for rejection. The tribunal...

Ad hoc disallowance of 10% of expenses - Since the AO or the Ld. CIT(A) has not rejected the books of account of the assessee they could not have estimated (ad hoc...

Disallowance of bad debts as claimed u/s 36(1)(viia) - deduction claimed @10% of aggregate average advances - AO is directed to make relevant enquires and verifications...

Disallowance to 10% of the sub brokerage expenses - the Tribunal not accepting 20% disallowance and limiting the disallowance to 10% in these facts cannot be said to be...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

Deduction u/s 80IA - More than ordinary profit shown by the assessee under section 80IA(10) - Admittedly, in the case on hand the assessee is showing higher amount of...

Deduction u/s 10AA - AO estimated profit of SEZ unit at 3% as against 6.95% of the turnover - the onus is on AO to prove the presence of any arrangement between the...

Entertainment tax subsidy - capital or revenue receipt - disallowance u/s. 37 - AO made ad hoc disallowance u/s. 37 @ 10% of expenditure. However, the said disallowance...

The ITAT held that interest disallowance was not justified as borrowed funds were invested in equity shares, not loans. Disallowance of land acquisition cost was...

Deduction u/s 80IB(10) - there could be no presumption that surrendered amount would represent business income unless and until assessees satisfies the authorities below...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decided the following: Disallowance of proportionate interest expenses was unjustified as the assessee had sufficient...

Exemption u/s 10(38) - bogus LTCG on purchase and sale of shares - disallowance brokerage expense - penny stock transaction - ssessee has successfully proved the...

The ITAT Surat held that disallowance of business loss on sale of securities as LTCG in penny stocks was unjustified. The AO failed to provide evidence of collusive...

In the case before ITAT Mumbai, the issue revolved around the deduction u/s 80G for a charitable trust. The assessee, now assessable as an AOP, had donated an amount...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

Quick Updates: