Condonation of delay – Invalid service of notice – Well settled ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

August 30, 2015

Condonation of delay – Invalid service of notice – Well settled that party should not be condemned unheard and case should not be rejected on technical grounds, rather should be decided on merit unless delay is attributable to gross negligence of party - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Condonation of delay – Invalid service of notice – Well settled ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

August 30, 2015

You may also like:

Condonation of delay - delay of 345 days in filing the appeal before CIT(A) - Each case for condonation is to be decided on its own facts and merits. The facts may...

Additions/ disallowances - It is well settled that nobody should be condemned unheard as per maxim 'Audi Alteram Partem' - AT

Condonation of delay in filing the response to notice - Dishonour of Cheque - There was no prayer for condonation of delay in present complaint. But foundation is there....

Validity of issuance of notice under Section 153C - The issuance of the invalid notice dated 14.06.2019 does not compromise the assessment proceedings as, the invalid...

Power of NCLT to condone the delay beyond 15 days - Condonation of Delay of 27 days in filing for restoration was admitted - It is beyond comprehension as to how such a...

Condonation of delay of 324 days - on account of illness of one of Trustee of the assessee-trust during the relevant period - It is a settled proposition that it is not...

Condonation of delay – Ignorance of law is not an excuse - delay not condoned - AT

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - There is no cap as regards condonation. By saying no cap, it is meant that the Appellate Tribunal is not stifled when it comes to...

Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

Principles of natural justice - legality and validity of ex-parte order - There is nothing to indicate as to how this affixing at company premise should be construed as...

Condonation of delay - delay is of 20 years - Here, the applicant wants to condemn the advocate behind his back. In my view, it is impermissible and unacceptable....

Application for condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) - condonation of delay in filing returns and claiming refund - Section 119(2)(b) does not impose any limitation for...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

The services provided by the appellant, a referral service for Canadian banks and foreign universities, were examined to determine whether they constituted 'Export of...

Validity of assessment - Non service of notice u/s 143(2) - unless there is service of notice in accordance with provision under Section 282 of the Act separately...

Quick Updates: