Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of ...

Court Rules on Refund Denial: Goods Cleared, Unjust Enrichment Irrelevant, Refund Entitled as Cenvat Credit Re-credit.

September 1, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of differential duty worked out in each invoice. The goods were already cleared - question of unjust enrichment does not arise. - appellants are eligible for refund amount debited in RG.23C-Part-II as re-credit of cenvat credit - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of consequential refund - entire demand arose out of ...

Court Rules on Refund Denial: Goods Cleared, Unjust Enrichment Irrelevant, Refund Entitled as Cenvat Credit Re-credit.

September 1, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the denial of refund of excess tax paid by contractors under the Haryana Alternative Tax Compliance Scheme for Contractors,...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Denial of refund claim - unjust enrichment - There is no provision in the Central Excise law that the state government authorities would be are outside of the principles...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Denial of refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - appellant has not provided any service at all. - question of unjust enrichment does not arise - AT

Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding unjust enrichment not applicable retrospectively for finalization of provisional assessments prior to 1999....

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Quick Updates: