Invalid return- e-filing of the return - ITR-V Form had not been ...

Court Allows Taxpayer to Verify Return with Assessing Officer After ITR-V Form Not Received by Processing Center.

December 26, 2011

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Invalid return- e-filing of the return - ITR-V Form had not been received at Centralized Processing Center though several times sent by ordinary post - the assessee permitted to file a verification of the return before the Assessing Officer within a period of one week from date of order.... - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Invalid return- e-filing of the return - ITR-V Form had not been ...

Court Allows Taxpayer to Verify Return with Assessing Officer After ITR-V Form Not Received by Processing Center.

December 26, 2011

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Validity of Proceedings u/s 144C - Eligible assessee - Original ITR filed declaring the status as "Resident" - In the revised ITR the status declared as "Non-Resident" -...

Time limit for furnishing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the newly migrated taxpayers extended.

FORM GSTR-9A - Annual Return (For Composition Taxpayer) - Goods and Services Tax

Set off of MAT credit u/s.115JAA - assessee being a company had filed its return of income in ITR-6 (i.e. prescribed form) under schedule for MAT credit (Schedule MATC),...

Assessment proceedings were pending when registration u/s 12A was granted on 22/02/2016. The assessee had filed income tax return in ITR-7 instead of ITR-5. The issue...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking rectification of mistake in filing the wrong income tax return (ITR) format, as the assessee had full knowledge of filing...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

Reopening of assessment - reasons for re-opening within or beyond 4 years - reasons to believe - The court specifically pointed out that the information used from the...

The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

Tribunal held that Assessing Officer's disallowance of depreciation u/s 32 was incorrect as no specific asset was singled out for testing its individual usage. CIT(A)...

The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered whether the Central Processing Centre (CPC) was justified in denying the benefit of the New Tax Regime to an individual taxpayer...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Quick Updates: