Tribunal held that Assessing Officer's disallowance of ...

Depreciation disallowance & unexplained credits remanded for fresh adjudication.

Case Laws Income Tax

October 11, 2024

Tribunal held that Assessing Officer's disallowance of depreciation u/s 32 was incorrect as no specific asset was singled out for testing its individual usage. CIT(A) failed to consider assessee's legal contentions. Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to allow assessee opportunity to prove entitlement to claim depreciation despite no business activity. Regarding addition of unexplained share application money u/s 68, assessee's contention that no fresh credits were received during the year was not examined. CIT(A) confirmed addition without verifying whether any sum was actually received. Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to allow assessee to substantiate no credits on account of share application money or membership fees and decide issue afresh. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal held that Assessing Officer's disallowance of ...

Depreciation disallowance & unexplained credits remanded for fresh adjudication.

Case Laws Income Tax

October 11, 2024

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the...

Disallowance u/s 14A - disallowance of administrative expenditure to arrive at average total asset for computing disallowance as per formula prescribed by Rule 8D on the...

Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - There are no piece of evidence to take a contrary view to the finding of the first appellate authority as to...

Power of Remand - The order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) remanding back the matter for fresh adjudication is set aside and the case is remanded back to the...

Validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 - Unexplained cash credit and application of section 115BB - The ITAT while upheld the reassessment proceedings sicne AO...

Unexplained credit u/s 68 - peak credit theory - CIT(A) has rightly rejected the claim of the assessee of adopting peak theory for considering unexplained credit - AT

Disallowance of interest and financial expenses was not justified as the appellant paid interest and financial expenses to State Bank of India, Overseas Branch,...

The appellants challenged the order contravening FEMA for unauthorized direct investment outside India in an overseas JV not engaged in bona fide business activity. They...

HC considered levy of tax, interest, and penalty on CMWSSB for supplying purified water. HC found issues with adjudication: 1) Misinterpretation of purified water...

CENVAT Credit - capital goods - availment of credit while availing depreciation - The adjustment in the balance sheet of 2015-16 cannot be considered as reversion of the...

Input Tax Credit - commission paid to the foreign agent - High Court has observed some discrepancy in the order of tribunal - The High Court ought to have then remanded...

Notional income rejected as assessee had recovered project cost from toll, advertisement and rental income, hence no designated return earned. Revenue subsidy disallowed...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

Disallowance of depreciation on goodwill - scheme of amalgamation - the very purchase of goodwill is not proved by the assessee - Disallowance of depreciation is thus...

The ITAT held that interest disallowance was not justified as borrowed funds were invested in equity shares, not loans. Disallowance of land acquisition cost was...

Quick Updates: