Undervaluation of goods - no documentary evidence was produced ...

Tribunal Misinterprets Partner Statements, Overlooks Evidence in Goods Undervaluation Case at Chennai and Mumbai Ports.

November 9, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

Undervaluation of goods - no documentary evidence was produced by the assessee to support the plea that the goods at Chennai port were inferior in quality than the goods imported and cleared at Mumbai port - Tribunal has not only misinterpreted the statements of two partners of the assessee, it has also sidetracked and ignored other relevant material. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Undervaluation of goods - no documentary evidence was produced ...

Tribunal Misinterprets Partner Statements, Overlooks Evidence in Goods Undervaluation Case at Chennai and Mumbai Ports.

November 9, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Smuggling - Gold of foreign origin - Absolute Confiscation - town seizure - reliability of statements/retraction of statements - The tribunal highlighted inconsistencies...

CENVAT Credit - invoices issued without actual supply of materials - retraction of statements - burden of proof - personal penalty on partner of appellant firm....

Confiscation of the gold bars - remelted gold of foreign origin or not - The admissibility and weight of retracted statements - The Tribunal found that the appellants...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Valuation of imported goods - stamping foils - rejection of declared value - The tribunal found that the department's reliance on proforma invoices for A-grade goods was...

The case pertains to an addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment in agricultural land at Ratlam. The issue revolved around whether the addition was based on...

Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing the appeals of the assessee, solely by holding that there is no sufficient corroborative evidence to statement tendered by...

Clandestine removal - The department relied on statements, diaries, and records, which the appellants contested, citing coercion and lack of corroboration. The Tribunal...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in making additions u/s 68 for unsecured loans and disallowing interest component. The assessee demonstrated...

Classification of imported goods - plastic regrind - waste or not - restricted goods or prohibited goods - The Tribunal acknowledges the restrictions on the import of...

Addition of excess stock found during the course of survey - unexplained investments u/s 69 r.w.s.115BBE - The Tribunal observed that the assessee provided plausible...

The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition to the stock based on a search, relying on statements from the General Manager and Director. The stock update process was...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 on the Director of the company - Allegation of Clandestine removal of goods - The Tribunal observed that the statement of an employee, admitting...

Quick Updates: