Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2018 Year 2018 This

Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing the appeals of the ...


High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision: Appeals Allowed Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence Supporting Assessee's Partner's Statement.

January 5, 2018

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing the appeals of the assessee, solely by holding that there is no sufficient corroborative evidence to statement tendered by partner of assessee, (para 6.3), even when statement tendered by Central Excise Officer is admissible before court of law as piece of evidence? - Held Yes - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  2. Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

  3. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

  4. Confiscation of the gold bars - remelted gold of foreign origin or not - The admissibility and weight of retracted statements - The Tribunal found that the appellants...

  5. Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

  6. ITAT quashed assessment order regarding additions under section 56(1)(vii) amounting to Rs. 139.67 crores made on basis of third-party documents found during search...

  7. Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

  8. Clandestine removal - The department relied on statements, diaries, and records, which the appellants contested, citing coercion and lack of corroboration. The Tribunal...

  9. The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

  10. Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

  11. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs...

  12. The assessee university's application for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected due to non-submission of audited accounts and failure to provide necessary...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

  14. Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal condoned a 97-day delay in filing an appeal due to a prior writ petition. An order lacking a Document Identification Number was deemed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates