Exclusive employment of the company - prohibition contained in ...

Section 314(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956: Relatives of directors in non-remunerative roles don't breach employment prohibitions.

December 19, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Exclusive employment of the company - prohibition contained in Section 314(1)(b) of the 1956 - relative of a Director of a company - The statutory mandate is that being a Director in a non-remunerative and non-executive position in other companies does not amount to being in employment of those companies or holding a place of profit in those companies. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Exclusive employment of the company - prohibition contained in ...

Section 314(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956: Relatives of directors in non-remunerative roles don't breach employment prohibitions.

December 19, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

Disqualification of a director of the financial creditor to sign the Section 7 application was challenged. The application u/s 7, signed by the director of the financial...

Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

Refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ledger of the petitioner - applicability of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 54 or sub-section (1) of...

Vires of the proviso to Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act - Disqualification for appointment of Director - The exclusion of Directors from vacating their posts in...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Recovery of tax dues of the company from the Director u/s 179(1) - Director is now no more (deceased) - Before passing an order u/s 179, the Assessing Officer should...

Challenging the constitutional validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme “Electoral Bond Scheme” or “Scheme” - The Supreme Court held that, the Electoral Bond Scheme, the...

Vicarious liability of Additional Director - Non-executive Independent Directors or not - Officer in default - non repayment of deposits by the Company to the depositors...

Company to have Board of Directors - easier requirements with respect to appointment of resident director. It also seeks to specify limits with respect to pecuniary...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Interest u/s 234B - The term “assessed tax” has been defined in Explanation-1 of Section 234B (1). As per said Explanation-1 “assessed tax” means the tax on the total...

Provisional attachment - jurisdiction to pass the provisional attachment order - A cumulative reading of the provisions of Section 83(1) read with Section 122(1-A) of...

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Quick Updates: