Refund - Unjust enrichment - duty was paid under protest during ...

Refund Granted: Duty Paid Under Protest Not Passed to Consumers, No Unjust Enrichment Found During Adjudication Proceedings.

December 24, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise SC

Refund - Unjust enrichment - duty was paid under protest during the pendency of the adjudication proceedings - there was no question of passing on this element of duty to consumers/buyers. - Refund cannot be denied - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Unjust enrichment - duty was paid under protest during ...

Refund Granted: Duty Paid Under Protest Not Passed to Consumers, No Unjust Enrichment Found During Adjudication Proceedings.

December 24, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise SC

You may also like:

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

Refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - Dispute relating to classification was resolved in favor appellant assessee - The tribunal found...

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

The appellant agreed that duty paid by mistake to the government was passed on to the principal contractor under protest. Their argument was that the principal...

Refund of excess amount paid over and above 1% of CVD - unjust enrichment - The refund claims were sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority itself. Those were...

Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment...

Refund claim - rejection on the grounds of unjust enrichment - The tribunal noted that invoices presented by the appellant showed the duty being passed onto the...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Quick Updates: