Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - ...

Appellant Wins Central Excise Duty Refund Case; Successfully Proves No Unjust Enrichment as Amount Listed as Loan.

December 28, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - unjust enrichment - appellant has been showing the amount for which refund is claimed, in the balance sheet under head loan and in advances. - appellant has not expensed out the amounts which have been paid by them as excess Central Excise duty - Refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - ...

Appellant Wins Central Excise Duty Refund Case; Successfully Proves No Unjust Enrichment as Amount Listed as Loan.

December 28, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

Refund of Excise duty paid under protest - it was obligatory on the part of Central Excise Officer to have issued a notice to the appellant for payment of the short paid...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Deduction u/s 80 IB - Central Excise Duty refund & interest subsidy - held as Capital receipt - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

Quick Updates: