Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by ...

Refund claim initially rejected, later allowed. Duty not passed on. Interest payable after 3 months of exemption order, not from claim date.

Case Laws Central Excise

August 9, 2024

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded matter to verify unjust enrichment after holding appellant eligible for exemption. Original authority determined duty element not passed on. Appellant ineligible for interest from date of original refund claim filing. For periods without show cause notice, refund claims filed later. Appellant eligible for interest on delayed refund payment from date after 3 months of Order-in-Appeal allowing exemption, as per Section 11BB of Central Excise Act.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by ...

Refund claim initially rejected, later allowed. Duty not passed on. Interest payable after 3 months of exemption order, not from claim date.

Case Laws Central Excise

August 9, 2024

You may also like:

Interest on Refund - initially the amount was credit to Consumer Welfare Fund later cash refund was allowed - interest on refund allowed. - AT

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund of IGST amount and duty drawback - In view of the fact that the applications for refund of IGST and duty drawback are still pending, it is directed that the...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially,...

The court held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- deposited with the department, along with statutory interest and interest on refunds. The...

Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Interest on refund claim - relevant date for calculating the interest arising due to a delay in the payment - appellant claimed credit from the date on which they...

Interest on refunds - interest would be payable after the period specified in clause (a) to sub-section (3) to Section 38 of the Act i.e. the date on which the refund...

Rejection of claim for interest on delayed refund - If the claim for refund itself was not maintainable in law, the question of grant of interest does not arise. The...

Refund claim - SAD - N/N. 102/2007-Cus dated 14.9.2007 - appellant claims that even though initially they have availed the CENVAT credit of the duty paid on the said...

Payment of interest u/s 244A on the amount of refund payable to the assessee - CIT(A) concluded that the claim of ‘interest’ by the respondent for the refund amounts to...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Quick Updates: