Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Considering one of the methods ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 30, 2015

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Considering one of the methods of accounting for determining the profits of the project adopted by the CIT (A) is not free from the debate or dispute. It is also a settled issue that when debate is an integral part of any addition, the concealment penalties will not survive. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Considering one of the methods ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 30, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty 271(1)(c) - additions on account of donation and charity, and on account of loss on sale of assets, which were debited to the profit and loss account - The ITAT...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Income disclosed by the assessee in the Return of Income which is not part of Regular Accounts - CIT(A) directed the AO that levy penalty...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)- assessee refused to answer the notice u/s 142(1) - assessee was an attorney of some account holder - levy of penalty confimred - HC

Quick Updates: