Levying penalty u/s 271(1 )(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Applicable for Income Added via Deeming Provision of Section 2(22)(e.

January 16, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levying penalty u/s 271(1 )(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - the conscious act of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of income cannot be attributed to the assessee, specially when the addition u/s 2(22)(e) was made under the deeming provision - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levying penalty u/s 271(1 )(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Applicable for Income Added via Deeming Provision of Section 2(22)(e.

January 16, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - deemed dividend - While levying the penalty, the deeming provisions can be applied to a limited extent and instant...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accrual of income for assessee society - In assessee`s appeal assessing officer treated contribution towards welfare Fund and Hospital Fund as...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - the explanation of the transaction being commercial in nature for purchase of property - the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Having capitalized the amount of foreign exchange fluctuation in the relevant block of assets reveals its clear intent of treating it as capital...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Quick Updates: