Refund of SAD - jurisdiction to entertain the refund claim - it ...

Refund Claim for Special Additional Duty Rejected Due to Jurisdiction Error by Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs at Airport Complex.

January 19, 2016

Case Laws Customs HC

Refund of SAD - jurisdiction to entertain the refund claim - it cannot be said that the main refund application was filed before the AC/DC of Customs, who did not have jurisdiction over the Airport and Air Cargo Complex - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of SAD - jurisdiction to entertain the refund claim - it ...

Refund Claim for Special Additional Duty Rejected Due to Jurisdiction Error by Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs at Airport Complex.

January 19, 2016

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund claims to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacturer....

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the...

Refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) - Period of limitation - Conditions of a notification should be strictly construed. This being so, as per sub para (c) of para 2...

Refund of Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) being rejected due to mismatch in description of imported goods, non-compliance with Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. It...

Special Drive Fortnight to rectify errors relating to IGST refunds.

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Refund of Cenvat credit - Rule 5 – Power of Additional Commissioner to adjudicate refund claim - AT

The case involves a dispute over the refund of Special Additional Duty paid on imported goods. The Appellate Tribunal held that the refund application cannot be rejected...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Commissioner to process the refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) and the direction to transfer the claim to the...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) demanded from respondent after GST introduction on imported goods - refund of duty paid on re-import - time limitation....

Quick Updates: