Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund ...

Refund Claims Should Not Be Dismissed for Export Warehouse Portion, Says Appellants to Central Excise Commissioner.

July 27, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund claims to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacturer. The said refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground that a part of the refund related to the warehouse of the exporter.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund ...

Refund Claims Should Not Be Dismissed for Export Warehouse Portion, Says Appellants to Central Excise Commissioner.

July 27, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Time limitation for filing refund claim is one year from relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax under Finance Act,...

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

Eligibility of refund claim of input services on export of goods - The contention of the appellant that cleaning activity is not taxable and therefore refund of Service...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Claim of rebate/ refund - export consignment was not sealed - ARE-Is, did not have a certification of the Central Excise Officer that the export goods were sealed with...

Refund claim for service tax paid on ocean freight not barred by time limitation. Section 11B(5)(B)(ec) of Central Excise Act, 1994 made applicable to Finance Act, 1994...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

Refund of accumulated credit - rejection on the ground that there was no “Physical Export” under Rule 5 - It is undisputed that for the period from January2014 to...

Quick Updates: