Imposition of penalty - the role of the appellant is not ...

Appellant Penalized for Assisting in Diverting Export Goods to Local Market; Penalty Reduced Due to Mitigating Factors.

March 12, 2016

Case Laws Customs AT

Imposition of penalty - the role of the appellant is not restricted to introduction of the parties but have actively assisted M/s. FIL and its directors in diversion of the goods in the local market which were supposed were processed and the exported - levy of penalty (though reduced) confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - the role of the appellant is not ...

Appellant Penalized for Assisting in Diverting Export Goods to Local Market; Penalty Reduced Due to Mitigating Factors.

March 12, 2016

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Imposition of redemption fine and penalty - Overvaluation export of readymade garments - The CESTAT observed that, to ascertain the value of goods, the Revenue has done...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

Misuse of Advance Authorisation for export of garments - Diversion of imported goods into open market without using the same in export goods - The Tribunal upheld the...

Levy of penalty on appellant u/s 114 (i) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - assisting / abetment of export of Muriate of Potash - illicit export of goods - Based on...

Levy of penalty - Improper importation - prohibited imports - The Adjudicating Authority has rightly taken the market value of such goods as prevailing in the local...

Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty levied on appellant as co-noticee for principal violator's diversion of duty-free imported goods under DEEC scheme to local market without...

Overvaluation of export goods - There is no illegality in conducting a local market survey to gather the valuation of the goods for the purpose of exercising power under...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Who is liable to pay duty - Export Goods allegedly diverted in the local market in the guise of export - Bond executed by the non-existent merchant exporter -...

penalties u/s 112(a)/114AA of the Customs Act - duty free import of the raw Lead Ingots for manufacturing diverted to local market - goods were transported from ICD,...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export goods or not - goods were cleared by the appellant, not for physical exports, but were cleared by them to their sister concern, who is...

The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2022 on the Appellant, who was the Director of Sales and Marketing of the co-noticee Company. The Respondent...

Penalty imposed on a small player in dry cell battery market reduced from 4% to 2% of relevant turnover due to mitigating factors like insignificant market share, lack...

Penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty on the owner of the godown where goods were reportedly loaded - from the statement of the Appellant herein which...

Quick Updates: