Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Test of Unjust enrichment - Refund consisting differential fine ...


Refund Allowed: Unjust Enrichment Test Applies Only to Duty and Interest, Not Differential Fines or Penalties Under Customs Act.

March 19, 2016

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Test of Unjust enrichment - Refund consisting differential fine and penalty - proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962 deals with applicability of test of unjust enrichment to the duty and interest element but not to differential fine or penalty. - Refund allowed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

  2. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  3. Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

  4. Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

  5. Refund of duty – principle of unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund of interest and redemption fine- - AT

  6. Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

  7. Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

  8. Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

  9. Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

  10. Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

  11. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

  12. Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment...

  13. The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

  14. Refund of Excise Duty - unjust enrichment - As it is on record that excess duty and differential excess amount received by the appellant has been refunded to the dealers...

  15. Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates