Merely because the industrial undertaking earned higher profits ...

Court Rules Higher Profits Insufficient to Reduce Deduction Claims Without Evidence.

April 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Merely because the industrial undertaking earned higher profits does not call for an inference that claim of deduction is to be willy nilly reduced on presumption. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Merely because the industrial undertaking earned higher profits ...

Court Rules Higher Profits Insufficient to Reduce Deduction Claims Without Evidence.

April 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 80IA on the enhanced expenditures made to sub-contractors - The issue of the claim of higher deduction on the enhanced profits has been a contentious one....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on deposits with a Cooperative Bank. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A)...

Levying MAT u/s 115JB - 100% reduction of the profit u/s. 80IB(10) - while computing the book profit u/s. 115JB appellant had reduced it from book profit and claimed...

ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding GST disallowance u/s 43B. The tribunal found that GST amount was not routed through Profit & Loss account but shown under...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

The High Court held that the deduction u/s 33AC for creating a reserve to acquire new ships must be factored in while computing the deduction u/s 80-I, which is based on...

Deduction u/s. 80JJA - Computation of profits - AO allowed the claim - CIT(A) reduced the claim of deduction - In the present appeal AO rightly deducted the depreciation...

ITAT ruled on joint property ownership and tax deduction claims. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim under Section 54, finding no legal impediment to claiming...

HC allowed the appeal, setting aside ITAT's order rejecting additional evidence under Rule 29. The court found ITAT committed a legal error by summarily dismissing the...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

Dispute centered on Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules regarding input tax credit (ITC) calculations following tax rate reduction on iron and steel goods. SC upheld HC's...

The case pertains to deductions claimed by the assessee u/ss 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act for amounts written off by rural branches and the...

Deduction of broken period interest paid on securities and deduction of expenditure incurred on the issue of Fully Convertible Debentures (FCDs). Regarding broken period...

The case involves a dispute regarding the eligibility of deduction u/s 80IB for profits derived from repairs and maintenance services of moulds in an industrial...

Quick Updates: