Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

Penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) - claim of the assessee ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 27, 2016

Penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) - claim of the assessee became untenable by virtue of retrospective operation of law, otherwise, the assessee could have demonstrated the allowance of its claim - no penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  3. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  4. This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

  5. The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The provisions...

  6. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  7. The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

  8. Disallowance u/s 37(1) - penalty amount - Merely because the assessee categorised the claim under “penalty levied on the assessee company for not complying to the terms...

  9. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of charge - defective notice - Merely because the assessee claimed the expenditure by virtue of a change of head of income and...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - even the assessee withdrew the claim u/s 54F in respect of two flats out of three, the mere withdrawal of the claim would not turn the bonafide...

  12. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates