Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2016 Year 2016 This

Loss arising in the course of dividend stripping transaction ...


Dividend Stripping Losses Before April 1, 2002, Valid Despite Being Pre-Planned; Not "Abuse of Law" Per Section 94(7).

June 6, 2016

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Loss arising in the course of dividend stripping transaction before the introduction of claim u/s.94(7) w.e.f. 1.4.2002 cannot be disallowed; dividend stripping transaction cannot be said to be “abuse of law” even if it is pre-planned - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Source of Income of Public Servant or Ostensible Owner - Addl. CIT - Abuse of official position, as public servant - possession of disproportionate assets - This Court...

  2. Forex loss - allowable business loss u/s 37(1) or not? - The assessee company has entered into transactions of buying and selling of forex and incurred a loss on the...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

  4. Approval of the Resolution Plan - the CoC is well aware that there is delay in implementation of the plans of ‘Allied Strips Limited’ and ‘Tirupati Infraprojects Private...

  5. Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

  6. Loss claimed as business loss - As all the three conditions of section 94(7) are not fulfilled, loss of sale of securities to the extent of dividend income cannot be...

  7. MAT - Addition of Book Profits u/s 115JB – Dividend Stripping u/s 94(7) - The Explanation (f) of Section 115JB was clearly applicable in case of the appellant - AT

  8. Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

  9. Deductibility of the provision for future losses - in the various decisions discussed above it has been held that applicability of AS-7 is acceptable. In this case it...

  10. This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

  11. Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

  12. Corporate guarantee not discharged by approval of resolution plan for principal borrower under IBC. Supreme Court judgments in Lalit Kumar Jain, Maitreya Doshi, and Ajay...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  14. Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not...

  15. Seeking GST registration to be effective from retrospective effect i.e. 1.7.2017 - Migration from erstwhile tax laws to GST - Bonafide error in making application - The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates