Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2016 Year 2016 This

Non-levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA - revision u/s 263 - AO being ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 11, 2016

Non-levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA - revision u/s 263 - AO being quasi judicial authority has not initiated the penalty proceedings in the assessment order is his jurisdictional authority. The ld. CIT cannot just substitute the authority of the AO with his opinion. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - mistake of non-initiation or incorrect initiation of penalty - the inherent indication u/s 271(1) makes it clear that the Pr. CIT / CIT does...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  3. Disciplinary proceedings against formerly Appellate Deputy Commissioner - If the order passed by the quasi judicial authority is taken as a foundation for bringing the...

  4. The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - It is well settled principle of law where A.O. has exercised quasi-judicial power vested in him in accordance with law and arrived at a conclusion and...

  6. Penalty proceedings u/s 271AAA - the penalty was initiated u/s 271AAA in the quantum assessment order whereas the same has finally been levied u/s 271AAB which would...

  7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in the capacity of a revisional authority qua the new material but was required to perform the task of AO in...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - AO did not initiate penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1) (c) - No hesitation in holding that the CIT is not correct in assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 of the...

  10. Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

  11. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

  15. Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates