Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in ...

PCIT's failure u/s 263: Lacked independent action, denied taxpayer rights to confront new SEBI evidence.

November 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in the capacity of a revisional authority qua the new material but was required to perform the task of AO in tandem and discharge quasi-judicial function independently. - PCIT has failed to do so. Neither the purported evidence collected from SEBI were confronted nor the cross examination of adversarial statement was provided. The opportunity contemplated under S. 263 is thus rendered illusory and merely an empty formality resulting in miscarriage of justice in contravention of expresses intendment of law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT could not merely sit solely in ...

PCIT's failure u/s 263: Lacked independent action, denied taxpayer rights to confront new SEBI evidence.

November 15, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The order passed by the PCIT suffers from lack of due opportunity of hearing as the PCIT while making such observation that the lender...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Even if we agrees to the contention of the Ld. A.R. of the assessee that Explanation 2(c ) below section 263(1) of the Act is not applicable...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

Revision u/s 263 - receipt of on-money - incriminating material found in search or not? - PCIT should himself have conducted the enquiry or causing to make such...

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - All particulars were available before the PCIT in respect of such income and the PCIT upon being satisfied, accepted such declaration. Thus, if...

ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

The ITAT Jaipur addressed a case involving a revision u/s 263 concerning the addition u/s 68 based on a report from an investigation in Mumbai. The PCIT contended that...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 due to discrepancies in the assessment order, including undisclosed TDS, differences in purchases...

Quick Updates: