There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 28, 2016

There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals). In such a scenario, we agree with the ld. Advocate that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) had travelled beyond the scope of the appeal before him and is required to be set aside on the said ground itself. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 28, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act s only applicable to residents and not to Non Residents. - In the instant case also Ld. A.O...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Clarification regarding exports under claim for drawback in the GST scenario - Circular

BANKING MEASURES IN CURRENT ECONOMIC SCENARIO - Article

Classification of services - Levy of GST - leasing of pathway to a person to her/his dwelling unit - The applicant has agreed through a MOU to tolerate her use of this...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Even if we agrees to the contention of the Ld. A.R. of the assessee that Explanation 2(c ) below section 263(1) of the Act is not applicable...

Orders passed by CIT-A without proper jurisdiction - the very action of then Ld. CIT(A)in ignoring the binding directions given by DGIT and proceeding to pass orders...

The Trade Notice issued for waiver of charges for the late filing of Bill of Entry at Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House. It supersedes previous standing orders and public...

Where the assessee has opted not to appear before the ld. Pr. CIT nor before this Tribunal and has merely filed the appeal but has not pursued the appeal so filed by it...

Taxable services - refrain from an act or agreed to tolerate any act - surrender of tenancy rights or benefits - the view of adjudicating authority that ‘capital gains’...

Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 - share application money pending allotment treated as undisclosed money - The manner in which ld. CIT (A) passed the appellate order...

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

Validity of assumption of jurisdiction by the ld. PCIT u/s.263 - disallowance of interest on borrowed funds - this matter certainly requires factual verification and the...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not...

Revision u/s 263 - The records of the instant case speaks that no details were filed by the assessee before the Ld. A.O to prove the reasonableness of payments made to...

Quick Updates: