There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) Oversteps Bounds; Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Revenue Cross Appeal.

July 28, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals). In such a scenario, we agree with the ld. Advocate that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) had travelled beyond the scope of the appeal before him and is required to be set aside on the said ground itself. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

There was no cross appeal filed by the Revenue before the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) Oversteps Bounds; Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Revenue Cross Appeal.

July 28, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Rationalisation of Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal - as per the amendment to sec 253 revisional order passed u/s 263 by PCC or CC or an order u/s 154 are now...

Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - Initially the appellant was advised to file a representation before the Chief Commissioner against...

Restoration of cross objection appeal - Dismissal of appeal of the revenue on low tax effect - consequently cross objections of the assessee were also dismissed - the...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - Dismissal of appeal on the ground that the appeal was delayed by thirty three days - exclusion...

Introduction of the authority of Joint Commissioner (Appeals) - In order to reduce burden or bottleneck of small cases with small amount of disputes and demand from...

Jurisdiction - genuineness of transfer of Cenvat Credit to GST Tran-1 - competence of the Commissioner Appeal who has passed the impugned order on the ground that the...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

Maintainability of appeal - Jurisdiction under service tax vs central excise - Revenue has filed the appeal under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 and the said appeal...

Maintainability of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - reassessment of bill of entry - if an assessee wants to challenge the assessment of bill of entry, he...

Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - appeal filed before Commissioner (Appeals) after a delay of 11 months - More time has been taken by the department for...

Filing of appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - time limit - Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) was justified in dismissing the appeal as barred by time. - HC

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs...

Quick Updates: