Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with notice u/s 142(1) - the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act for Non-Compliance Deemed Unjustified; No Default Found.

September 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with notice u/s 142(1) - the failure of the assessee to comply with such notice cannot be said to be a default which may justify the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act.- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with notice u/s 142(1) - the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act for Non-Compliance Deemed Unjustified; No Default Found.

September 13, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - where the assessment order was finally passed u/s...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Quick Updates: