Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second ...


Tribunal Overturns Penalty for Denied Deduction, Citing Good Faith and Genuine Belief in Auditor's Opinion.

March 20, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was made in good faith. They emphasized that the claim was based on the opinion of the auditor and was supported by genuine belief. Despite the deduction being ultimately disallowed, the authorities found that there was no intention to provide inaccurate particulars of income. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified and was deleted.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  2. The case involved penalty proceedings u/s 270A for under-reporting or misreporting of income. The appellant argued that there was no underreporting as the transaction...

  3. Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

  4. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

  5. Penalty u/s 270A - AO has disallowed the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 24 and Chapter-VIA deduction as false claims - The appellant contested the penalty on various...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders...

  8. The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

  9. Eligibility of Deduction u/s 80P - bank interest earned from cooperative banks - The Appellate Tribunal found that even if the interest income is not considered as...

  10. AO's penalty order under s270A regarding leave salary exemption claimed on voluntary retirement under s10(10AA) was set aside by ITAT. The appellant, permanently...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  12. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

  14. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates