Disallowance towards credit purchases - simply because DDs were ...

Court Rules: Encashing Demand Drafts in Chennai Doesn't Prove M/s. Shagun Jewellers Is Bogus Firm.

November 15, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Disallowance towards credit purchases - simply because DDs were encashed in Chennai and not in Delhi, AO cannot presume that M/s. Shagun Jewellers, Delhi is a bogus firm. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowance towards credit purchases - simply because DDs were ...

Court Rules: Encashing Demand Drafts in Chennai Doesn't Prove M/s. Shagun Jewellers Is Bogus Firm.

November 15, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

CBEC releases Draft Rules and Formats - Draft GST Registration Rules, GST Payment Rules and GST Invoice Rules with formats

The doctrine of prospective overruling is applied when a constitutional court overrules a well-established precedent by declaring a new rule but limits its application...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

The High Court held that once the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found no cogent or convincing evidence from the Revenue to allege bogus purchases, it was wrong to...

CBEC releases draft Rules and Forms for GST refund and returns

Demand in respect of firm raised in the name of Partner - In the light of the legal nature of a partnership firm, a demand raised on the managing partner can never be...

HC examined procedural compliance in tax assessment proceedings. The court determined that the order dated March 30, 2021 constituted a draft assessment order rather...

Bogus transaction in the scrip - bogus LTCG - Onus to prove - Income generated by the assessee cannot be held bogus only on the basis of the modus operandi,...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and...

Imposition of penalty - Issue of bogus invoices - Penalty under Rule 26, whether under sub-Rule (1) of Rule 26 or under sub-Rule (2) of Rule 26 can be imposed on a...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

Dishonor of Cheque - A proprietorship firm is neither a Company, nor a partnership firm. It is merely a business name. Although even a partnership firm is not a juristic...

Unexplained Money u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE - Cash withdrawal from the firm as partner of the firm - along with confirmation letter given by the firm, assessee has also...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Quick Updates: