The proceedings initiated now are to re-classify the service ...

Service Reclassification: Tax Demand Limited to Normal Period, No Penalties Imposed for Erection, Commissioning, Installation Services.

February 1, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The proceedings initiated now are to re-classify the service under Erection, Commissioning and Installation Service - the appellants were registered with the department and discharging service tax under a different category of service - demand, if any, should be limited to a normal period - no penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The proceedings initiated now are to re-classify the service ...

Service Reclassification: Tax Demand Limited to Normal Period, No Penalties Imposed for Erection, Commissioning, Installation Services.

February 1, 2017

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Valuation - C&F Agency services - reimbursement of the expenditure - demand restricted to normal period - penalty waived - AT

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

Service tax liability assessment - trainings exempt as commercial coaching service prior to 2010, taxable subsequently; works contract composition scheme benefit...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Sugar syrup having 78.2% sugar content emerged as an intermediary product during biscuit manufacturing, an exempted final product. CESTAT held sugar syrup was marketable...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

The CESTAT held: The demand of service tax under 'site formation service' for June 2005 to May 2007 by culling out site formation charges from a composite mining...

Key issues regarding invocation of time limitation for raising demand, levy of penalty, exemption from service tax for bundled services related to the game of cricket,...

Sub-contractors liable to pay Service Tax even if main contractor pays tax on entire amount after 23.08.2007 circular, earlier confusion on issue. Appellant entered...

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

Quick Updates: