Refund claim - per-deposited amount - the amount which is in ...

Refund Claim Approved: Excess Pre-Deposited Amount in Central Excise Case Deemed Unauthorized Under Article 365 of Indian Constitution.

February 23, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund claim - per-deposited amount - the amount which is in excess of the adjudged amount if retained that such retention of said amount shall be without authority of law and Article 365 of Constitution of India has not authorized Revenue to retain such amount - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - per-deposited amount - the amount which is in ...

Refund Claim Approved: Excess Pre-Deposited Amount in Central Excise Case Deemed Unauthorized Under Article 365 of Indian Constitution.

February 23, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund claim of pre-deposit while appeal is pending - adjustment of amount was paid in lieu of pre deposit for filing the appeal before this Tribunal - Since the demand...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

CESTAT denied interest claim on pre-deposit refund made u/s 35F of Central Excise Act. Pre-deposit from 2012 was refunded in 2018 post-favorable appeal outcome. While...

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin...

Compliance with the requirement of pre-deposit - Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - To Consider the amount deposited during investigation as pre-deposit -...

Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

Interest on the pre-deposit - The Tribunal found that the issue revolved around whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the pre-deposit u/s 35FF of the...

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

CESTAT dismissed appeal regarding interest claim on refunded pre-deposit u/ss 35F and 35FF of Central Excise Act. Appellant had deposited amounts through CENVAT account...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Claim of interest on delayed refund, from the date of deposit till the refund of the pre-deposit of principal amount - the assessee is entitled to claim interest from...

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

Quick Updates: