Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of ...

Tribunal Erred by Reducing Penalty Without Following Dharamendra Textile Precedent in Central Excise Case.

February 24, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise SC

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile Processors - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of ...

Tribunal Erred by Reducing Penalty Without Following Dharamendra Textile Precedent in Central Excise Case.

February 24, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise SC

You may also like:

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Commissioner failed to follow binding Tribunal precedents on classification of bio-fungicides and bio-insecticides, erroneously believing Supreme Court appeals left...

Import of baggage without declaring goods - Levy of penalty - carrying contraband or dutiable goods - the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in reducing the redemption...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeals concerning valuation of imported used clothing under Tariff Item 63090000. Following precedent cases including Venus Traders and...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Penalty - Confiscation of foriegn currency - carrying currency in excess of prescribed limit - penalty reduced - AT

ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on multiple transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal ruled that reimbursements received at cost from Associated Enterprises require...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Proceedings against importer when the sole proprietor of M/s Ganpati Enterprises had expired - mis -declaration and short payment of duty - imposition of penalty on...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

Quantum of penalty u/s 114 of CA - Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty - It is not the case that penalties imposed under the provisions is a mandatory...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

ITAT reversed penalties imposed under s271(1)(c) and s271AAB against assessee regarding disputed cash expenses and labor payments. AO's additions were initially made at...

Penalty imposed on a small player in dry cell battery market reduced from 4% to 2% of relevant turnover due to mitigating factors like insignificant market share, lack...

Quick Updates: