Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value ...


Revenue Appeal Dismissed: Authorities Must Adhere to Tribunal Decisions Without Justification for Deviation.

October 21, 2024

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying grounds or reasons for departing from the Tribunal's order followed by the Adjudicating Authority. Section 35R(4) is applicable only to the Commissioner (Appeals) and Appellate Tribunal, requiring them to consider circumstances under which an earlier order was accepted and not challenged. This section does not set aside the principle of judicial precedents and the binding nature of higher Appellate Authority orders. Authorities below the Tribunal are bound by its earlier orders. The impugned order set aside the original authority's order solely because the Tribunal's order was accepted due to monetary limits, without stating grounds contrary to the Tribunal's observations. The original authority kept demand notices awaiting the Tribunal's decision and adjudicated accordingly after it set aside the order. The impugned order lacked merits for differing from the available higher Appellate Authority order without specifying grounds, leading to the appeal being allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Tribunal set aside the order of the licensing authority that revoked and forfeited the security deposit of a Customs Broker. The licensing authority alleged breach...

  2. Customs officials claim to have received illicit gratification - Clearance of restricted goods without following proper procedures - improper finalization of provisional...

  3. Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority,...

  4. All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has chosen to disregard them on the ground that the...

  5. Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

  6. Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) case involving valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value. The tribunal...

  7. Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

  8. Valuation of goods transacted between related persons - Royalty addition - The Appellate Tribunal scrutinized the jurisdictional implications and competence of the...

  9. The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee's (SCC) actual...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - shares of the assessee companies issued at huge premiums - The Calcutta High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, rejecting the appeal filed by the...

  11. Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

  12. Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

  13. SCN issued for cancellation of registration without detailed reasons. Held: Respondent authorities' approach commendable for complying with natural justice by giving...

  14. CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal examined the classification of services provided by the appellant to overseas educational institutions, determining whether they constituted...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates