The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 28, 2017

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the credit after due intimation of removal of the capital goods to the Dept. In these circumstances, penalty u/s 11AC of CEA,1944 read with Rule 15 of CCR,2004 is not attracted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant under the bonafide impression did not reverse the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 28, 2017

You may also like:

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - removal of capital goods as such - power plant - Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - The sale of goods or transfer of ownership of the...

Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k)...

Removal of Inputs as such – no need to reverse Cenvat credit availed on Input Services

Cenvat credit on capital goods - No credit was availed in the initial (first) year - Whole of the credit (100% credit) was availed in the subsequent year - There is...

Recovery of CENVAT Credit - capital goods - availability of credit when the production started become dutiable - even if the goods per se were exempted during the...

CENVAT Credit - capital goods - appellant is not required to reverse CENVAT Credit taken on the capital goods, which was procured and subsequently re-exported - AT

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - capital goods - removal of equipment as waste / scrap - It is not contemplated, either in Finance Act, 1994 or in general commercial usage,...

CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to...

Recovery/reversal of credit - Export of Goods - Credit was availed under Rule 16 on returned Goods - The view taken by the authorities below is that reversal of the...

CENVAT Credit - transfer of ownership / sale to another without removal of capital goods goods - would be construed as removal within the meaning of Rule 3(4) of the...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - inputs/capital goods or not - HR, MS and SS plates received and utilized during 2003 to 2005 for setting up of Copper III plant - The Tribunal...

Reversal of cenvat credit - removal of capital goods after use - the case of the Appellant was covered under the second proviso to Rule 3(5) and not under Rule 3(5A) of...

CENVAT Credit - Capital goods - removal as such - when the respondent has not taken CENVAT credit therefore, they are not required to reverse any credit on these capital...

CENVAT Credit - inputs or not - The CESTAT was justified in dismissing the Department’s appeal since the credit was claimed in respect of the inputs used for fabrication...

CENVAT Credit - inputs or capital goods or used for the manufacture of the final product - steel items - appellant is not even claiming the Cenvat credit in respect of...

Quick Updates: