Clandestine manufacture and removal - on the basis of ...

Court Rules Energy Use Not Definitive for Estimating Goods Production; Overturns Demand Based on Gas Usage.

March 9, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine manufacture and removal - on the basis of consumption of energy required for manufacture of unit quantity of goods quantum of manufacture of goods cannot be arrived at and such conclusion of manufacture shall be treated as presumptive - the confirmation of demand on the basis of consumption of Gas does not survive. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine manufacture and removal - on the basis of ...

Court Rules Energy Use Not Definitive for Estimating Goods Production; Overturns Demand Based on Gas Usage.

March 9, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy of Cess under Clean Energy Cess’ 2010 - The court held that the revenue could levy Clean Energy Cess on coal produced and lying in stock as of 30th June 2017, as...

RG 1 vis a vis Daily production record - Product comes out of reactor in very hot conditions and daily production report maintained on rough estimate basis - Demand on...

The doctrine of prospective overruling is applied when a constitutional court overrules a well-established precedent by declaring a new rule but limits its application...

CENVAT Credit - Whether the department can demand and recover under Rule 14 an amount under Rule 6(3) (i) equal to 10% of the value of the exempted products? - under no...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - electrical energy is not an excisable goods nor it is exempted goods as defined in rule 2(d) of the Credit Rules. Thus, as electricity is not...

Exemption from service tax - Job work - printing of PVC film/ sheets - Manufacturing activity vs Processing of goods - It is to be seen that the activity of production...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Explanations to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and Rule...

The High Court allowed the petition challenging the demand raised by the respondent Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority from the petitioner towards GST and...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

Recovery of CENVAT Credit - capital goods - availability of credit when the production started become dutiable - even if the goods per se were exempted during the...

Clandestine manufacturing and removal - manufacturer of Pan Masala & Gutkaha - the whole demand have been raised by way of wild guesswork. - The whole demand has been...

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Quick Updates: