Validity of notice u/s 158BC - The words 'not less than fifteen ...

Court Invalidates Notice: Assessing Officer Misinterpreted "Not Less Than Fifteen Days" in Section 158BC, Requiring Early Return Filing.

March 9, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of notice u/s 158BC - The words 'not less than fifteen days' have to be interpreted correctly. In that view of the matter, since the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to file the return within fifteen days of the service of the notice, the notice issued by the Assessing Officer is invalid. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of notice u/s 158BC - The words 'not less than fifteen ...

Court Invalidates Notice: Assessing Officer Misinterpreted "Not Less Than Fifteen Days" in Section 158BC, Requiring Early Return Filing.

March 9, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

Validity of order passed u/s 144B - disregarding the stay granted by this court - In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer is referring to a letter stating that...

Assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed for non-issuance of show cause notice. Case transferred from faceless Assessing Officer to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s...

Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer instead of Facessing Assessing Officer held invalid as lacking jurisdiction u/s 151A read with Central...

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Reply of the assessee through reproduced but the contents thereof are not even referred or analyzed...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Rejection of objections of the assessee - The stance of the Assessing Officer leads this Court to prima facie believe that the...

Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A - notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing...

Quick Updates: