Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Franchise Service - Extended period of limitation - it is ...


Court Rules No Fact Suppression in Franchise Case; Demand Set Aside, Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable.

March 15, 2017

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

Franchise Service - Extended period of limitation - it is submitted that since the business activities of the appellant were known to the Department, suppression of facts cannot be alleged - demand set aise - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand for service tax on commission received on vehicle sales, sales promotion, and incentives under 'Business Auxiliary Services' set aside as show cause notice failed...

  2. Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

  3. The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

  4. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  5. Extended period of limitation – Revenue neutrality - Demand set aside - AT

  6. The CESTAT held that the demand of Rs.80,61,111/- (including Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess) raised on the ground of difference between the...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

  8. Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

  9. The case involved a dispute over the classification of "KARA" brand wet wipes under two different tariff items. The issue of time limitation was raised, with the...

  10. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  11. Invocation of extended period of limitation - since the agreement between appellants and broadcasting company was known to department the allegation of Suppression of...

  12. The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

  13. Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which...

  14. Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts - Claiming SSI exemption - Suppression of turnover - As the demand is based on the basis of information appearing in...

  15. Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates