Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 on transporter - ...


Transporter Penalty u/r 26 Overturned; Not Required to Verify Manufacturer's Duty Compliance in Central Excise Laws.

March 24, 2017

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 on transporter - contraband items - transporter can not be expected to be the expert of Central Excise laws to find out before transporting the goods as to whether the manufacturer has correctly discharged the duty burden or not - penalty set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

  2. Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

  3. Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

  4. Penalty under rule 26 - payment of short paid and non-paid duty by the main manufacturer would not result in conclusion of proceedings against all other persons on whom...

  5. Levy of personal penalty on co-noticees - when the proceedings against the manufacturer/assessee stand concluded on payment of disputed amount of duty plus interest plus...

  6. Levy of Penalty u/r 26 of CER on the buyer / purchaser of goods - The Revenue has not brought on record as to the role of the appellant in the non-payment of Excise Duty...

  7. Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

  8. Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there...

  9. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  10. Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all the appellants were indulged in abating the manufacturer for fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit...

  11. Compliance with the pre-deposit - adjustment of duty paid under protest during investigation - the petitioner cannot contend that because a paltry amount was deposited...

  12. Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by the manufacturer - the requisite evidence necessary for levy of penalty on each of the Appellants under...

  13. Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

  14. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  15. Illicit clearance - penalty on transporters - brass and copper scrap - any transporter, in the commercial sense, is merely required to deliver goods at the consigned...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates