Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - ...

Transporters Avoid Penalties u/r 26 for Lack of Evidence in Clandestine Goods Removal Case.

March 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved themselves in clandestine clearance - The goods were accepted and carried by the drivers on the assurance that they would be issued invoices - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - ...

Transporters Avoid Penalties u/r 26 for Lack of Evidence in Clandestine Goods Removal Case.

March 25, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

Confiscation of goods - Clandestine removal of goods - since goods were within factory, means rea manifesting that goods were ready for clandestine removal has not been...

The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Clandestine removal - Shortage of raw material and finished goods - no verification at the buyer/supplier’s end conducted by the Revenue - mere payment of duty on the...

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 on the Director of the company - Allegation of Clandestine removal of goods - The Tribunal observed that the statement of an employee, admitting...

Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit...

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of...

Quick Updates: