Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has made a claim, which is one ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

April 4, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has made a claim, which is one of the arguable claims, but assessee in its own wisdom, withdrawn that claim During the course of assessment proceedings itself, but it cannot be said that the claim of the assessee was wrong or false - no penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  2. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1) - addition of wrong claim u/s 80IB made by assessee in the return & surrendered during scrutiny proceedings - such claim is solely based on the report...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee in this case has never revised its return during the period prescribed u/s 139(1) rather withdrew the claim during assessment...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income...

  7. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - not entitled for the deduction U/s 54 - claim deduction allowed U/s 54F - once, the assessee has explained the reasons for making a wrong claim...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  12. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied for disallowance u/s 80IB(10). The assessee's claim was based on financial statements, adopting one of the possible interpretations, and...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates