Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee in this case has never revised ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

February 21, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee in this case has never revised its return during the period prescribed u/s 139(1) rather withdrew the claim during assessment proceedings when confronted by the AO. So, by no stretch of imagination, the claim made by the assessee for deduction u/s 80IB and 80G can be considered as inadvertent claim rather it is deliberate and conscious claim made to evade the taxes - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  2. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revised returns were not valid returns u/s 139(5) and that, such returns were not voluntarily filed rather the same were filed only after...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - income voluntarily offered before commencement of assessment proceedings - the time limit for furnishing the revised return of income u/s 139(5)...

  5. Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) under Explanation 5A - no return u/s 139(1) - return filed u/s 153A disclosing Capital Gain which was accepted - it is neither a case of bonafide...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

  8. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

  9. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, there was no question of making inadmissible claim of deduction u/s 10B in such revised return. In fact,...

  10. Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

  11. Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - suo moto disclosure of income before detection by the AO - It is the settled law that the belated return cannot be revised under the...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied on income declared in the revised return of income filed u/s. 139(5) - Admittedly, there is no allegation that the revised return of income...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates