Revenue seems to have been entirely motivated in ensuring that ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 15, 2017

Revenue seems to have been entirely motivated in ensuring that the refunds due to the petitioner / assessee are somehow not given effect to and that the demand is made so as to ensure that all other periods, available to the petitioner, are shortened. This is a plain case of abuse of power under Section 220(1) which no Court can countenanc - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revenue seems to have been entirely motivated in ensuring that ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 15, 2017

You may also like:

Dishonour of Cheque - Veracity of the said ‘Authority Letter’ - whence the present petition has been filed on technical grounds wherein almost more than 2 years have...

Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims - Guidelines issued to ensure uniformity in issuance of speaking order for refund - Details...

Grant of refund - the attitude on the part of the AO leaves us with a feeling (not based on any evidence) that the Officers of the Revenue seem to believe that it is not...

Refund claim - Once an application of refund has been filed before the refund sanctioning authority, the said authority is duty bound to decide the refund application...

Refund of pre-deposit - refund claim filed by the CHA is proper or otherwise - It is not the case that whether CHA is claiming the refund. Those are applications of...

Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and...

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Revenue cannot set off or withhold a refund without issuing an intimation u/s 245 of the Income Tax Act. Section 245(1) mandates that before setting off a refund against...

Recovery of Refund - The original orders passed by the adjudicating authority in sanctioning the refunds in favour of the appellants were not challenged by Revenue...

Withholding of refund u/s 241A - It is settled law that the refund due to the Petitioner is liable to be released at the time of issuance of the intimation/order under...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Refund of un-utilised Cenvat credit of Service Tax - The Rule 5 read with notification is very specific and lays down how to determine the quantum of admissible refund...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Revision u/s 263 - Use of word "seems" by the CIT while recording reasons - It seems that, Assessment order passed by the A.O. in this case is erroneous and prejudicial...

Refund claim - service tax paid under mistake of law - time limitation - Assessee's claim to refund would not be disallowed solely because it seemed barred by limitation.

Quick Updates: