Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Income-tax Rules Amended: Form 3CD Gets Major...     TaxTMI    SCN Issued Two Days Beyond Section 73(2) Deadline...     TaxTMI    CBIC Revises Tariff Values Under Section 14(2) for...     TaxTMI    Diamond Imprest Authorisation Form Updated with...     TaxTMI    Sea Cargo Manifest Regulations: CBIC Extends...     TaxTMI    CBIC Implements Electronic Processing for Personal...     TaxTMI    CBDT Authorizes Waiver of Interest on Delayed...     TaxTMI    GST Assessment Order Set Aside for Lacking Document...     TaxTMI    SEBI Introduces New Governance Rules for High Value...     TaxTMI    Government exempts Bengal gram from AIDC and SWS...     TaxTMI    CGST Rules Amended: Rule 164 Changes Affect Tax...     TaxTMI    SEBI Eases ESG Compliance: New Green Credit...     TaxTMI    CBIC Clarifies Section 128A Waiver Eligibility for...     TaxTMI    Transfer of Development Rights Constitutes...     TaxTMI    GST Fraud Mastermind Denied Bail Under Sections...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2017 Year 2017 This

Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to ...


CHA Penalties u/s 112(a) Require More Than Lack of Diligence; Additional Factors Needed for Penal Action.

September 19, 2017

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act 1962 - misdeclared goods - Abetting in illegal imports - The appellant has this certainly rendered...

  2. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

  4. The key points are: misdeclaration of goods by the importer cannot render the Customs House Agent (CHA) vicariously liable for penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962....

  5. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the Customs Broker - Section 112 ibid. does not contemplate penal action for violations of provisions or...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  9. CHA - Some inadvertence or lack of efficiency took place on part of the CHA and that is because of a regular dealing with the said importers and not because of gross...

  10. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

  12. Imposition of penalties u/s 112 (b) and 114AA On CHA - there is no element of mens rea or conscious knowledge which can be attributed to the CHA - CHA acted bona fide...

  13. Penalties u/s 112 (a) of CA, 1962 on CHA - at the time of filing the bill of entry the appellants did not get all the required documents to fulfill the KYC norms of the...

  14. Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

  15. The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Soil Purchase for Resale: Can Dispatch Challans Replace Proper Invoice...
F: Company Must Hold EGM to Adopt Financial Statements After AGM Failure,...
F: Jurisdiction Question: Can a Superintendent Issue GST Demand Summary W...
F: GST Audits Have No Time Limitation Under Section 65, Unlike Show Cause...
F: Pre-Deposit Refund After Favorable GST Appeal: System Error Workaround...
F: Taxpayer's Amnesty Scheme Payment at Risk Due to Missing DRC-03A Form ...
A: Mandatory GSTR-1 Filing: Reporting Outward Supplies Under GST With 15 ...
A: Filing OPC Annual Returns: 180-Day Deadline, Required Forms, and Commo...
A: Deodorant Sprays vs. Traditional Attars: Why Natural Indian Perfumes O...
A: Low-Quality Chinese Imports Harm Indian Industries: Solutions Include ...
A: Comprehensive Export Risk Management: Strategies for Political, Econom...
A: India's Pharmaceutical Industry Seeks to Reduce Dependence on Chinese ...
A: Proposed U.S. Tariffs on Indian Pharmaceuticals Could Raise Drug Price...
A: Saharanpur Wooden Craftsmanship: Traditional Artistry Supporting Artis...
A: Preserving Cultural Heritage: How Mithila Paintings Support Women Arti...
A: Mughal-Inspired Mirzapur Rugs: Preserving Traditional Craftsmanship Wh...
H: GST Orders Uploaded Without Proper Service Violate Natural Justice, Co...
H: GST Time Extension During COVID-19: Court Defers Ruling on Section 168...
H: Bail denied for mastermind accused of Rs. 53.03 Crore GST fraud throug...
H: Lufthansa Wins Challenge Against Withholding Tax Rate Change Under Ind...
H: Section 54F Deduction Denied: Timing of House Purchase and Constructio...
H: Tax Relief: Exchange of Old Flat for New in Redevelopment Not Taxable ...
H: Interest on Rupee-Denominated CCDs Must Be Benchmarked Against Domesti...
H: Assessee in Power Business Denied Enhanced 35% Depreciation Under Sect...
H: Taxpayer's Appeal Succeeds as Cash from Selling Deceased Wife's Jewelr...
H: Quantitative Restrictions on LAM Coke Imports Valid Under Section 9A o...
H: Courier Company Penalized for CIER Violations Despite KYC Compliance C...
H: Penalty Under Section 112(b) of Customs Act Reduced for Imported Motor...
H: Customs Act Section 149: Shipping Bill Amendments Require Contemporane...
H: Customs Duty Payment Under DGFT Amnesty Scheme Shields Importers From ...