Jurisdiction of Additional CIT - The Standing Counsel should ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 6, 2017

Jurisdiction of Additional CIT - The Standing Counsel should understand that this Tribunal is not to decide the mercy petition but has to decide the issue before it in accordance with the settled judicial principles of law. The Tribunal is not to decide the issue on the basis of human and irrelevant consideration. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of Additional CIT - The Standing Counsel should ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 6, 2017

You may also like:

Seeking rectification of an alleged mistake - question of jurisdiction of this tribunal - error apparent on the face of record or not - The Tribunal rejected the...

CIRP - the debt of the Respondents was declared as Financial Debt - Though the learned Counsel for the Appellants would contend that the Adjudicating Authority lacks...

Change of jurisdiction u/s 127 - As in the present case, the Assessing Officer rejected the objection regarding the jurisdiction and referred the matter to the PCIT to...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Rebate – jurisdiction of Tribunal – exclusion of the jurisdiction of the appellate Tribunal is expressly stated in the Statute - Tribunal was in error in entertaining...

Maintainability of appeal - Jurisdiction of Tribunal - there is a clear understanding that the confiscated goods were in the category of “baggage” and therefore under...

Rightful owners of 4000 shares or not - Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - The Appellate Tribunal emphasizes that the NCLT's...

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer u/s 120 - Transfer of case u/s 124 - Assessee had a legitimate expectation from the DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon, that the objection raised...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Non-payment of GST - recovery of tax alongwith interest and penalty - Jurisdiction - Even if we accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that...

Refund of CVD / Excise duty - case is yet to be decided even after 16 years lapsed - We fail to understand that if the claim of the writ applicant could not be looked...

Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the Assessing Officer - it is noticed that the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

Appointment of Arbitrator in applications - notified claims or not - Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act - It is observed that the learned Arbitrator shall first decide...

The Appellate Tribunal concurred with the Mumbai Tribunal's order in M/s Pooja Marketing, which comprehensively dealt with all aspects, facts, and applicable case laws....

Quick Updates: