Customs Broker - Prohibition imposed - The power to frame Rules ...

Case Laws Customs

February 27, 2018

Customs Broker - Prohibition imposed - The power to frame Rules given to the Board in the various fields enumerated in Clauses (a) to (g) of sub-Section (2) of Section 146 of the Act are not restrictive in any manner, but they provide for different fields for which Regulations can provide for. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Customs Broker - Prohibition imposed - The power to frame Rules ...

Case Laws Customs

February 27, 2018

You may also like:

Revocation of Customs Broker License - The Customs Broker is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. The Customs broker is not concerned with to ensure that the documents...

Suspension of Customs Broker License - Deemed Suspension or automatic suspension? - There is no existence of any provision of “Deemed Suspension” or “automatic...

Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Amendment Rules, 2019

Power given to Board to assign territories jurisdiction to specified officers in specified cases.

Revocation of Customs Broker License - It would not be unreasonable to assume that if the shipping bill is filed by Customs Broker X and the person representing the...

Customs broker licence revocation - importer engaged appellant to file import bill of entry but appellant used another broker's credentials instead of its own - imported...

Revocation of Customs Broker license - Regulation 10(n) requires the Customs Broker to verify correctness of Importer Exporter Code (IEC) number, Goods and Services Tax...

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2002.

This instruction clarifies that Customs Brokers should not be routinely implicated as co-noticees in cases involving interpretative disputes, unless their abetment in...

Revocation of the Customs Broker Licence - The appellant argued that the license had already been revoked once and reinstated by the Tribunal, making the subsequent...

Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

The CESTAT Kolkata, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a Customs Broker accused of illegal activities leading to the forfeiture of their security deposit...

Levy of penalty on the appellants u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Customs Broker firm - A Custom Broker is supposed to safeguard the interests of both exporters and...

The case involved a Customs Broker facing penalties under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation 2013 for alleged aiding in misclassification of goods. The Appellate...

Revocation of customs broker licence - undervaluation - The logical and sequential arrangement of the obligations devolving on customs brokers does not admit of any...

Quick Updates: