Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposits in bank ...

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Challenged: Notice Deemed Void for Lack of Specific Charge, Violating Natural Justice Principles.

March 21, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposits in bank account - validity of notice - absence of specific charge - this would be in utter violation of the principles of natural justice, such notice being null and void ab initio. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposits in bank ...

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Challenged: Notice Deemed Void for Lack of Specific Charge, Violating Natural Justice Principles.

March 21, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271AAA OR 271(1)(c) - issuance of a lawful notice u/s 274 - notice issued under wrong section - Reference in the second sentence is only to the making of the...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defect in the SCN - AO has issued a generic show cause notice in a printed form without mentioning the specific charge by striking off the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Quick Updates: